Statutory regulation is a form of regulation created through legislation. It typically involves a protected professional title, legal powers to set standards and statutory authority to investigate concerns and restrict or remove the right to practise.
Psychotherapy and counselling are not currently statutorily regulated in the UK. Instead, regulation operates through a voluntary system, overseen by the Professional Standards Authority (PSA). Under this system, professional bodies such as UKCP hold PSA Accredited Registers, setting standards for training, ethics and professional conduct procedures for practitioners who choose to join registers.
While the voluntary system provides important safeguards, it also has limits. Practitioners are not required to join a PSA Accredited Register, meaning some practise without meeting agreed professional standards or being subject to independent oversight. Where practitioners are registered, there are checks and balances in place, including information sharing between Accredited Registers and requirements to disclose relevant complaints or disciplinary history. However, regulatory powers within the voluntary system are more restricted than under statutory regulation, which can limit the ability to prevent unsafe practitioners from continuing to practise outside of voluntary regulatory system. This can make it harder for the public to understand who is regulated, what protections apply and where accountability sits. This context underpins UKCP’s approach to statutory regulation and our parallel work to strengthen the voluntary system.
UKCP has developed a set of principles designed to safeguard the public and strengthen confidence in the psychotherapy profession. We will support statutory regulation where it demonstrably meets these principles.
This position:
Only the UK government can introduce statutory regulation and there is currently no formal timetable.
Feedback from members and stakeholders showed strong support for public protection. It also raised concerns about overmedicalisation, accessibility and the diversity of psychotherapy modalities.
A principles-based approach allows UKCP to:
The principles describe what good regulation would need to achieve, rather than setting out a detailed regulatory model UKCP would support. This provides clarity while allowing flexibility as policy discussions evolve.
Alongside the work on statutory regulation, UKCP has agreed a set of voluntary enhancements - practical improvements to standards, processes and information within the existing Professional Standards Authority (PSA) Voluntary Accredited Register system.
These enhancements focus on what can be strengthened now within the existing voluntary framework. Together, they aim to improve consistency, transparency, safeguarding and public understanding across the voluntary system.
UKCP’s position was shaped through a year-long programme of work led by a statutory regulation working group. This included extensive engagement with UKCP members, organisational members, training organisations, sector partners and stakeholders, people with lived experience and staff. Feedback was gathered through surveys, webinars, discussion pieces and targeted engagement and was reviewed carefully. The position reflects the range of views expressed and focuses on the safeguards those who engaged with us told us matter most.
The working group brought together a range of perspectives from across UKCP, including senior leadership, policy expertise, practitioner experience, professional conduct and fitness to practise knowledge and experience of working with clients in both statutory and voluntary regulatory environments.
Only the UK government can introduce statutory regulation and there is currently no formal timetable. UKCP’s work ensures our organisation is clear about what it would support if statutory regulation were considered in the future.
The voluntary enhancements are a set of practical improvements to standards, processes and information within the existing Professional Standards Authority (PSA) Voluntary Accredited Register system that UKCP is taking forward. Shaped by member feedback, they aim to strengthen consistency, transparency, safeguarding and public understanding where statutory powers are not available.
We gathered feedback from members and stakeholders. There was strong engagement throughout the project. While views on statutory regulation differed, several consistent themes emerged.
Many respondents emphasised the importance of stronger public protection, including clearer minimum standards, better use of title protection, transparency for the public and safeguards to prevent unsafe practitioners from moving between registers held by professional bodies.
At the same time, members and stakeholders raised concerns about the potential risks of statutory regulation if it were poorly designed. These included overmedicalisation, loss of modality diversity, barriers to entry or progression – particularly for practitioners from underrepresented groups – and regulation that is disproportionate to risk.
There was also strong support for improving the current voluntary system, particularly around consistency of training standards, suitability and gatekeeping processes, clearer public information about accreditation and complaints routes, and stronger information sharing between registers.
Feedback highlighted the importance of fairness, accessibility and anti-oppressive practice. Respondents stressed that any regulatory approach should avoid creating unnecessary hurdles and should recognise the diversity of practice, training routes and practitioner backgrounds within psychotherapy.
Taken together, this feedback shaped UKCP’s decision to adopt a principles-based position on statutory regulation and to prioritise a programme of voluntary enhancementsthat can strengthen public protection now, while remaining attentive to the profession’s diversity and values.