Mixed methods research
In mixed methods studies researchers choose to combine different types of research methods. Most often researchers combine quantitative (eg a survey) and qualitative (eg an in-depth interview) research methods, in this case producing a combination of statistical and experiential data. Other researchers may combine different types of quantitative and qualitative methods in one study. Whatever methods researchers want to use and combine together it is important to explore and acknowledge the paradigms/perspectives in which different methods are often located. Paradigms/approaches include ideas about how knowledge is produced, what it is possible to know as well as about how to understand the world we live in and what it means to be human? The potential advantage of using mixed methods is that it can provide the benefits of different methods while compensating for some of their limitations. Mixed methods can offer the opportunity for a more complete understanding of psychosocial phenomena.
The following articles discuss the issues around mixed methods in more detail:
Hanson John W et al (2005) Mixed methods Research Designs in Counselling Psychology. Psychology, Department of Faculty Publications, University of Nebraska. Can be freely accessed at:
Dattilio, Frank M, Edwards, David J A, & Fishman, Daniel B (2010)
Case studies within a mixed methods paradigm: Toward a resolution of the alienation between researcher and practitioner in psychotherapy research. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, Vol 47(4): 427-441.
UK Council for Psychotherapy | Registered Charity No. 1058545 | Company No. 3258939 Registered in England
